icescrabblerjerky: “redbelles: “THE MUMMY (1999) + letterboxd reviews ↳ insp. & insp. ” I am fucking losing it at “way more than one mummy in this” FOUR STARS. I mean is that why they gave it four and not five? IF THERE HAD ONLY BEEN ONE MUMMY WOULD...
Zoom Info
icescrabblerjerky: “redbelles: “THE MUMMY (1999) + letterboxd reviews ↳ insp. & insp. ” I am fucking losing it at “way more than one mummy in this” FOUR STARS. I mean is that why they gave it four and not five? IF THERE HAD ONLY BEEN ONE MUMMY WOULD...
Zoom Info
icescrabblerjerky: “redbelles: “THE MUMMY (1999) + letterboxd reviews ↳ insp. & insp. ” I am fucking losing it at “way more than one mummy in this” FOUR STARS. I mean is that why they gave it four and not five? IF THERE HAD ONLY BEEN ONE MUMMY WOULD...
Zoom Info
icescrabblerjerky: “redbelles: “THE MUMMY (1999) + letterboxd reviews ↳ insp. & insp. ” I am fucking losing it at “way more than one mummy in this” FOUR STARS. I mean is that why they gave it four and not five? IF THERE HAD ONLY BEEN ONE MUMMY WOULD...
Zoom Info
icescrabblerjerky: “redbelles: “THE MUMMY (1999) + letterboxd reviews ↳ insp. & insp. ” I am fucking losing it at “way more than one mummy in this” FOUR STARS. I mean is that why they gave it four and not five? IF THERE HAD ONLY BEEN ONE MUMMY WOULD...
Zoom Info
icescrabblerjerky: “redbelles: “THE MUMMY (1999) + letterboxd reviews ↳ insp. & insp. ” I am fucking losing it at “way more than one mummy in this” FOUR STARS. I mean is that why they gave it four and not five? IF THERE HAD ONLY BEEN ONE MUMMY WOULD...
Zoom Info
icescrabblerjerky: “redbelles: “THE MUMMY (1999) + letterboxd reviews ↳ insp. & insp. ” I am fucking losing it at “way more than one mummy in this” FOUR STARS. I mean is that why they gave it four and not five? IF THERE HAD ONLY BEEN ONE MUMMY WOULD...
Zoom Info
icescrabblerjerky: “redbelles: “THE MUMMY (1999) + letterboxd reviews ↳ insp. & insp. ” I am fucking losing it at “way more than one mummy in this” FOUR STARS. I mean is that why they gave it four and not five? IF THERE HAD ONLY BEEN ONE MUMMY WOULD...
Zoom Info
icescrabblerjerky: “redbelles: “THE MUMMY (1999) + letterboxd reviews ↳ insp. & insp. ” I am fucking losing it at “way more than one mummy in this” FOUR STARS. I mean is that why they gave it four and not five? IF THERE HAD ONLY BEEN ONE MUMMY WOULD...
Zoom Info
icescrabblerjerky: “redbelles: “THE MUMMY (1999) + letterboxd reviews ↳ insp. & insp. ” I am fucking losing it at “way more than one mummy in this” FOUR STARS. I mean is that why they gave it four and not five? IF THERE HAD ONLY BEEN ONE MUMMY WOULD...
Zoom Info

icescrabblerjerky:

redbelles:

THE MUMMY (1999) + letterboxd reviews
↳ insp. & insp.

I am fucking losing it at “way more than one mummy in this” FOUR STARS. I mean is that why they gave it four and not five? IF THERE HAD ONLY BEEN ONE MUMMY WOULD THEY HAVE GIVEN IT FIVE? WAS IT A SEMANTIC PROBLEM WITH THE NAMING OF THE MOVIE OR DID THEY JUST GENUINELY NOT GET BLOWN AWAY BY IT ENOUGH TO GIVE IT FIVE. Best Gifset ever.

wannacuppatealuv:

Still trying to come to terms with the fact I’ll never be a librarian who can speak a dead language and be recruited by a ruggish but handsome explorer for a quest to lift the curse and save the world

dangerously-human:

gingerpolyglot:

kendallroy:

2020 in review: january, february, march, march, march, march, march, april, mayjunejulyaugustseptemberoctober, november 1, november 2, november 3, november 3 part 2, november 3 part 3, november 3 part 

image

Originally posted by jesseswartzwelder

I haven’t gotten to fully enjoy a “yesterday was Tuesday but today is Tuesday too” joke in years, and here we are with the PERFECT confluence of events to make that joke and I am LIVING